Search found 18 matches
- Sat Aug 03, 2013 10:06 pm
- Forum: Basilisk II
- Topic: Self-contained Basilisk II VM for OSX (cool!)
- Replies: 53
- Views: 42270
Re: Self-contained Basilisk II VM for OSX (cool!)
Just tried it. Same result, same error.
- Sat Aug 03, 2013 3:44 am
- Forum: Basilisk II
- Topic: Self-contained Basilisk II VM for OSX (cool!)
- Replies: 53
- Views: 42270
Re: Self-contained Basilisk II VM for OSX (cool!)
Huh. Followed this to the letter, on Mac OS X 10.8.4, but when I try to launch I get an error;
"You can't open 'MacOS81' because it may be damaged or incomplete."
Major bummer.
"You can't open 'MacOS81' because it may be damaged or incomplete."
Major bummer.
- Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:11 pm
- Forum: SheepShaver
- Topic: System 9.0.4 with Finder 9.2.2 in Sheepshaver
- Replies: 26
- Views: 25910
Re: System 9.0.4 with Finder 9.2.2 in Sheepshaver
Has anybody compiled a list of which 9.2.2 System Folder items work?adespoton wrote:I'm currently writing this from SheepShaver -- IE 4.5 on System 9.0.4 with all the goodies from 9.2.2 (including Finder) that work, with the rest rolled back to 9.0.4.
- Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:46 pm
- Forum: Basilisk II
- Topic: Preferences file
- Replies: 27
- Views: 14328
Re: Preferences file
Please take a look at the sheepvm functionality. Is that something worth copying for BasiliskII? http://www.emaculation.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=5754&hilit=sheepvm Please, YES! The sheepvm-style stand-alone VM method is the way to go. Set up the "hardware" once per configura...
- Fri May 06, 2011 6:49 pm
- Forum: SheepShaver
- Topic: Image icons not displaying thumbnail preview
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5705
- Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:30 pm
- Forum: Basilisk II
- Topic: .basilisk_ii_xpram hard-coded constant -- why not in prefs?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7571
- Wed Nov 03, 2010 3:52 pm
- Forum: Basilisk II
- Topic: BII support like in SheepShaver for self-contained bundles?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11530
BII support like in SheepShaver for self-contained bundles?
Any chance this feature could be ported to BasiliskII?Myrd wrote:I've committed a new feature to SheepShaver CVS. Currently, it is for Mac OS X and Unix only.
The idea is to allow for self-contained SheepShaver VMs, in a similar fashion to, for example, VMWare Fusion VMs.
- Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:01 pm
- Forum: Mini vMac and Other Mac Emulators
- Topic: Mini vMac Updates: May 27
- Replies: 16
- Views: 22922
Side note 2: Enabling color on Mac II mode on System 6 crashes the emulator. Side note 3: Special>Restarting on Mac II mode also crashes. I don't have either of those problems. Mini vMac 3.1.0, 8MB RAM, 800x600 System 6.0.8 (Universal install, I think), compiled from source using Xcode 3.1.2 on Mac...
- Mon May 11, 2009 7:22 pm
- Forum: Mini vMac and Other Mac Emulators
- Topic: Disk Copy Not Working In Mini vMac
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9257
DiskCopy 6.3.3
Yeah, Apple claims DiskCopy 6.3.3 works in 7.0.1+, but it's flaky. If you can find a copy of an earlier version (I use DiskCopy 6.1.3), it works just fine, including in emulation.
- Fri Nov 14, 2008 5:32 pm
- Forum: SheepShaver
- Topic: 3 x SheepShaver
- Replies: 19
- Views: 41588
- Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:54 pm
- Forum: SheepShaver
- Topic: 3 x SheepShaver
- Replies: 19
- Views: 41588
Re: 3 x SheepShaver
Would be a very large package, containing the disk images. True, but convenient for the user. Move the one file icon to move the entire "machine." Anyway, such packages could not be distributed because of Apple license agreement. Because of the ROM, you mean? True, that would have to be i...
- Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:42 pm
- Forum: Mini vMac and Other Mac Emulators
- Topic: Mini vMac: September 7
- Replies: 23
- Views: 29447
Thanks, but no. Apparently the latest Mini vMac builds work *only* on the *original* Mac II ROM; even the later version of the Mac II with FDHD floppies used a different ROM, which is the one you have. The same ROM was also used in the Mac IIx, Mac IIcx, and Mac SE/30. Well, I'll be a monkey's uncl...
- Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:28 pm
- Forum: Mini vMac and Other Mac Emulators
- Topic: Mini vMac: September 7
- Replies: 23
- Views: 29447
- Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:52 pm
- Forum: SheepShaver
- Topic: 3 x SheepShaver
- Replies: 19
- Views: 41588
Re: 3 x SheepShaver
With all related files in the same folder with the SheepShaver application, only file names are needed in prefs, no full paths. This makes it possible to run SheepShaver with different MacOS versions without changing settings, even run them at the same time: Interesting! I wonder if it's possible t...
- Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:35 pm
- Forum: Mini vMac and Other Mac Emulators
- Topic: Mini vMac: September 7
- Replies: 23
- Views: 29447
- Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:03 am
- Forum: Mini vMac and Other Mac Emulators
- Topic: Mini vMac: September 7
- Replies: 23
- Views: 29447
I have not tried them, but this looks like a large collection: http://kdxvcfa.dyndns.ws:8080/Downloads%201/ROMs/apple%20mac/ (Use right mouse button on the links to save to disk.) Thanks!! There are a few there I don't have... Sadly, no MacII.ROM, and the previous poster is correct, Mini vMac won't...
- Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:03 pm
- Forum: General Macintosh Emulation
- Topic: Emulation Benchmarks
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8317
Re: Emulation Benchmarks
The results say that Basilisk II JIT is much faster than SoftMac. They also say that neither SoftMac or Basilisk II have improved, speed-wise, in the last seven years. True, but the hardware we're running them on has gotten MUCH faster in that time, so our emulated Macs have, too. I recently had to...
- Thu Oct 16, 2008 12:55 pm
- Forum: Mini vMac and Other Mac Emulators
- Topic: Mini vMac: September 7
- Replies: 23
- Views: 29447
I don't have the proper ROM image, so I cannot test it out. But... it ought to work. That could be a problem. ;{) I've used Mini vMac for years, and I would looooove to help test this out; but although I've accumulated a wide array of Mac ROMs, the Mac II ROM just can't be found anywhere. Obviously...