Search found 13 matches
- Sat Nov 10, 2018 7:40 pm
- Forum: SheepShaver
- Topic: BeOS PPC on SheepShaver
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3731
Re: BeOS PPC on SheepShaver
It won't work because this emulator (along with Basilisk II) is practically like DOSbox for launching Mac OS, so no BeOS, no MkLinux. Lack of support of alternative systems on current emulators is one of reasons I've put proposals of "next-gen" Macintosh emulator (https://www.emaculation.c...
- Fri Nov 09, 2018 8:57 pm
- Forum: General Macintosh Emulation
- Topic: Best presets for Mac emulation?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4323
Re: Best presets for Mac emulation?
Nice, but situation would be a bit more complex: 1. I wouldn't tie presets to operating system versions since many versions of System Software/Mac OS can be run by two or more emulators. Sorting by hardware type (like in SoftMac) would be more logical. 2.There are some "white spots": A/UX ...
- Wed Oct 17, 2018 2:15 pm
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: Some Emulators Online Stuff
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7219
Re: Some Emulators Online Stuff
I am legit curious about the release of SoftMac he has promised. Darek certainly has the resources to produce an alternative to Basilisk II. If he could just implement the features SoftMac lacks (sound, networking, access to the host's files) we wouldn't need to use an old and not-really-updated em...
- Wed Feb 14, 2018 6:51 pm
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: [Offer] New 'General' GUI (Beta)
- Replies: 46
- Views: 26741
Re: [Offer] New 'General' GUI (Beta)
Few revisions later I have still the same problem with COMCTL32.ocx, the only difference is the message now in English.
P.S. I've successfully launched app in Compability mode (Windows XP SP3). My OS: Windows 10 x64
P.S. I've successfully launched app in Compability mode (Windows XP SP3). My OS: Windows 10 x64
- Wed Feb 07, 2018 7:55 am
- Forum: General Macintosh Emulation
- Topic: What about an unified Emulator?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 19972
Re: What about an unified Emulator?
As another idea, I think I could use Qemu instead of PearPC, since it runs OS 9 from 9.0 to 9.2, what SheepShaver can't, and it runs OS X 10.0, what PearPC can't, and of course it runs OS X 10.1-10.4. What I wonder is, if does the Qemu m68k emulator runs System Software, I'll test it tomorrow and s...
- Tue Feb 06, 2018 7:39 pm
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: [Offer] New 'General' GUI (Beta)
- Replies: 46
- Views: 26741
Re: [Offer] New 'General' GUI (Beta)
That message means that comctl32.ocx is missing. That is an extremely common requirement for older software. See for instance https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/apps_windows_10-winapps-appscat_tools/comctl32ocx-file-missinginvalid-for-windows-10/0d515059-0397-4b72-a39b-120a7be96043?a...
- Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:59 pm
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: [Offer] New 'General' GUI (Beta)
- Replies: 46
- Views: 26741
Re: [Offer] New 'General' GUI (Beta)
Hello. I've downloaded your project, but every time I try to launch, the app gives message: "El componente 'COMCTL32.OCX' o uno de sus archivos dependientes no esta registrado correctamente: falta un archivo o no es validado".
- Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:49 pm
- Forum: General Macintosh Emulation
- Topic: What about an unified Emulator?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 19972
Re: What about an unified Emulator?
That sounds fine! And I'd love to make something like that, we must start that project when I'll have in Beta VirtualMac! (Work in progress :wink: ) I'm glad to hear it. Especially because code of most of Mac emulators is a bit outdated. So, once again my proposals on new emulator: 1. The product s...
- Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:30 pm
- Forum: General Macintosh Emulation
- Topic: from where "Lisa OS 1.0"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6385
Re: from where "Lisa OS 1.0"
Apple Legacy Recovery CD doesn't have first version of Lisa Office System. But you can download it here: http://www.bitsavers.org/bits/Apple/Lisa/
- Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:37 am
- Forum: General Macintosh Emulation
- Topic: What about an unified Emulator?
- Replies: 28
- Views: 19972
Re: What about an unified Emulator?
Hello. I've heard of your idea. It's good, but why not create instead of front-end to existing emulators a whole new emulator that would emulate nearly every Mac (68k and PPC ones)? I've proposed earlier on this forum such idea of emulator which would be based mostly on WinUAE, so it would be able t...
- Fri Aug 11, 2017 8:11 pm
- Forum: Basilisk II
- Topic: Basilisk II re-write
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10078
Re: Basilisk II re-write
I'm here to explain suggestion in more details. What new features you desperately want from WinUAE? 1. MMU emulation (as it was required by A/UX and Linux distributions) 2. Full SCSI/IDE emulation (Softmac has it, also SCSI support was in build 142) 3. Since WinUAE can emulate full range of 68k proc...
- Thu Jun 29, 2017 4:53 pm
- Forum: Basilisk II
- Topic: Basilisk II re-write
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10078
Re: Basilisk II re-write
I was about needed workload. Actually I don't have programming skills, but I've asked if the work on re-writing would be hard.
- Thu Jun 29, 2017 7:23 am
- Forum: Basilisk II
- Topic: Basilisk II re-write
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10078
Basilisk II re-write
Hello, forum. I'm here with an idea (it's not new). Since Basilisk II uses UAE engine to emulate CPU, and development of WinUAE has greatly progressed last few years, I think Basilisk II should be updated and re-based to WinUAE. This would enable advantages such as MMU support (required by A/UX), em...