I can't stand people who feel the need to announce that they're leaving - as if that was supposed to change anything.

Don't let the door smack ya...

xeshaan wrote:no its not fine
as it fails at final step of ./configure

any help????????

it says no input file found.

What file is it looking for?

runnaway_mac wrote: I have a deadline to meet which is in 15 days I have more than 15 hours of video to edit on finalcut Pro HD

You can't be serious.

How would I go about compiling my own Altivec build?

I'm using the RemoteCVS ...it's been saying that I'm #7 in the queue for the past 20 mins or so. Is that normal? I chose the fast server.

What happened to the nightly's?

PPC_Digger wrote:no, it's not there.

I'm not sure about the CD patch but if you check out the latest code, the full screen mod, sdl, etc... is already a part of it so you don't have to apply the patches yourself.

PPC_Digger wrote:thanks.
what about the cd patches?

cd patches?

PPC_Digger wrote:no i mean the sdl patch for the source.

No need for a patch ...just do "cvs update" to get the latest source and use the "ui=sdl" option when configuring it.
You should try "./configure --help" first.

I just got it working by switching to the Realtek driver instead of 3Com. The SDL libraries I have installed: libSDL_ttf2.0-2.0.6-4mdk libSDL_mixer1.2-devel-1.2.5-3mdk libSDL_image1.2-devel-1.2.3-3mdk libSDLmm0.1-0.1.8-6mdk perl-SDL-1.20.0-8mdk libSDL_mixer1.2-1.2.5-3mdk libSDL1.2-devel-1.2.7-2mdk l...

I just tried a built that I had compiled (no SDL) on 6/19. The network works fine in it so something must be different in the new source.

any idea what that's about? ...the network used to work under Linux using the 3c90x driver - it doesn't anymore. I just compiled a SDL build from the latest source. Here's my config: ppc_start_resolution = "1024x768x32" cpu_pvr = 0x00088302 memory_size = 0x18000000 redraw_interval_msec = 1...

I was able to checkout the source but "cvs update" doesn't work. I'm getting:

perhaps your firewall blocks outgoing connections to port 2401. not the case ...it worked fine a few days ago ...and actually, I just checked it again and it's working now. BTW you said 80, are you using a web browser to access cvs? No, when SF was having problems with their pserver, I was able to ...

robojam wrote:I checked mine, it's 790MHz.

I just tested the latest altivec build on a 2.8GHz system with HT. It reported 1GHz.

I can't get in.
It's not responding on port 2401 and 80's giving me a 400 (Bad request)

prasys wrote:Hey

Video.x is the PearPC's PCI Fake Video Card..without it you will only can boot into Darwin....

I don't think video.x is being used in the new builds. I've deleted it and OS-X boots just fine without it. I didn't notice any decrease in performance either.

I get this when I try to configure the source using any ui option other than x11. What does that mean? checking pthread.h usability... yes checking pthread.h presence... no configure: WARNING: pthread.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor! configure: WARNING: pthread.h: proceedin...

I'm still having problems. Now I'm getting: configure: WARNING: pthread.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor! configure: WARNING: pthread.h: proceeding with the compiler's result checking for pthread.h... yes checking sys/socket.h usability... yes checking sys/socket.h presence....

If you check the CVS status that might explain this.... I did but then someone said it was fixed. I'm still having problems with it. The latest source produces: gmake[5]: Entering directory `/home/jacks/pearpc/src/system/ui/sdl' if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../.. -I ../../.. -Wundef -Wall...

I'm using "--ui=sdl" when running configure. All the SDL checks run fine but then when I go to compile it, I get this: if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../.. -I ../../.. -Wundef -Wall -Woverloaded-virtual -fsigned-char -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -g -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BI...

jhkl wrote:PearPC usually reports a 1 GHz G3 for me.

P4 3.0 GHz 800 FSB OCed To 3.35 GHz
1 GB of RAM
Win XP

Does it seem like OS-X is actually running at 1GHz? ...what's the reported bus speed?

robojam wrote:I think I got over 700MHz. I'll check when I get home and post a screen dump.

What's your hardware?

CaptainValor wrote:This is extremely hilarious!

But why is it a "General Problem"?

Not sure where to put it [?] ...please feel free to move the thread to the appropriate forum.

Globox wrote:Wait, why would they e-mail you?

It was a private message (from the forum), not an e-mail. A while ago, someone had asked where they can download OS-X and I put that link in the post as a joke. I hate explaining myself

felaras wrote:This new version no longer says 0MHz
http://mididim.hut.ru/proc.png

Wow! ...I wish I could get 719MHz here. 475 was my best so far.