can we have any precision on what you're talking about???

Rip it and share it on eD2k please???

just wondering, what is the interest of new releases of Basilisk? I mean, I just tried 1.0, and considering turning back to 0.9, cuz SDL is slow, and 0.9 was doing anything I could expect from a 68K, what's lackin, seriously?

hahahahaha, shit, you don't know any programming language, and you wanna add support for a second hard disk?? lol, you can be as well educated as you want it doesn't matter, what you think, that learning how to program is as easy as learning how to cook? "set to boot in place of widows" lo...

j/w, what is Mac OS K1?

ight, but, I remember having tried before with many other Linux distros, and never succeeded. however, for your information, Ubuntu is derived from Debian

I tried installing PowerFPU, and from what it told me, it seems that SheepShaver doesn't emulate a FPU. if so, why not?

I've, but I'll only tried running SheepShaver in many distros, recently in Ubuntu and Red Hat, but i'll only focus on my problems in Red Hat 9.0. First, when trying to launch the compiled RPM, it tells me that libreadline.so.4 is needed. so I looked for readline-4.3-5.i386.rpm, and when i launched i...

Cat_7 wrote:I guess the developments around OSX on X86 are also occupying some minds....


Cat_7

well, i call that something exciting happening

if i remeber good, SheepShaver will only work with NewWorld ROM's, thus not letting you use anything below 8.5 (correct me if im wrong). If you want to use 8, use Basilisk II (but you wont be able to use PowerPC apps tho)

There's a guy wrote an howto guide for installing OS X, Windows and Linux on a PC, and Apple made him take it down. Some websites relayed it, but I saved it from Google's cache, http://www.geocities.com/michel0528/mul ... .htm?20056, just in case anyone finds it usefull.

Someone "supposedly" got it running in VMWare, but I haven't heard any information how, just seen screenshots. The file system on the disk is HFS+ yeah I tried with UltraISO and it says it's HFS+ too. I read reports talking about it works if you install Darwin 8.1 first, do some setting u...

ummm... can't even turn the DMG file to ISO with DMG2ISO, says : reading property list...ok found 5 partitions decompressing: partition 0...ok partition 1...ERROR: Inflation failed anyways, if it's the real thing, won't nobody write a virtual machine for it? btw, whats supposed to be the file system...

as far as i know it's an hoax. nobody real seems to have found any valid leaked version, and unless you made sure urself it was some real thing, i'll keep thinkin it's an hoax. seems like it's likely that Apple has put some kinda different code in each DVD so they can know who would leak it...

Let us face it, Appple now switch to only software company this will stop hardware within few next years I think you're totally wrong. I'll get it to this thread to prove that it is a STANDARD x86 motherboard/system to me it sounds obvious, even if the CPU is a x86, the motherboard will be an Apple...

CaptainValor wrote:I'm more interested in getting a copy of x86 OSX.

I know we're not supposed to talk about P2P, but it appears that x86 versions of 10.4 have been leaked and are available on P2P networks.

just wondering, would anyone know what to do with a x86 version of Mac OS X?

ummm.. strange, but hey, that's a good thing to try that! keep trying!

> btw Yellow Dog Linux would probably slow down a lot more than PearPC. maybe, but after all, they still make a Linux for 68K's... > Does this mean that they will be making no hardware of their own anymore no don't worry, it will still be the exact same thing as before, except that instead of having...

I'm asking this because, well i'm using PearPC, but not that much, because I haven't found any real use to it. I mean, it's so slow and all that, I can't even get to do networking with it, the only use that I found to it was to admire the niceness of Mac OS X...

what about you?

haha, what your getting for this? a ban?

DittoBox wrote:All hardware sucks, all software sucks.

nooooo, not all, only the ones with bugs suck

kaziorvb2 wrote:but will the emulation of macos classic be faster?

no, why would it? having a x86, it will take it the same task to get to emulate mac os classic, i mean emulating a whole PowerPC machine

> I love macintoshes that they are - PowerPC and 68k processors NOT x86!!! Fuck Intel, PCs and other SHIT! wow man, now that shit sounds kinda dumb. if you're such a macmaniac, you surely remember all the issues apple had in order to get provided enough IBM CPU's? and remember how long IBM CPU's sta...

works for me, i got quicktime 5.0 on it and opening images with picture viewer. but what are you using to attempt viewing images?

i'm not sure, but i think the reason why there is no sound is that there is no sound in the ROM we are using, but I may be wrong (always thought startup sound was inside the ROM)