Login  •  Register


The time is now: Sat Mar 28, 2020 5:26 pm

Emaculation wiki  •  Delete all board cookies



Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [ 17 posts ]
Print view Previous topic  |  Next topic
Author Message
 Post subject: Apple in x86....
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:00 pm 
Offline
Student Driver

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 6:57 pm
Posts: 16
Location: House
Hmm... Apple in x86.... It sounds bad... I love macintoshes that they are - PowerPC and 68k processors NOT x86!!! Fuck Intel, PCs and other SHIT! But If this nightmare will be real - will the emulation of PPC be faster? I think not because of still-not-native emulation... But I think wrong - please correct me. I think the Mac OS X is much worther than prev versions - 9, 8, 7. My fav is 9. Will I can run 9 on the Intel-based Mac?

Eh... Apple was really alternative of PC-crap, but it is going to be the same shit. Mac OS X... it is really like Windows. The difference betweet Mac and PC is getting smaller and smaller... :S

I can only hope that I will can fast emulate or run pre-x mac oses ;]

But it is paranoic:

Switch Mac OS / Windows on PC :[

Sorry for fucks, shits, craps etc.

End of: "Think Different"
Begin of: "Think The Same" :(


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 4:12 pm 
Offline
Tinkerer

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:26 am
Posts: 41
Location: Orlando, Fl
It doesn't matter what chips or other hardware the computer uses. OS X is Macintosh, and OS X isn't going to change just because it's running on a new processor. Macs will be Macs no matter what, just now they'll be more competitive because they'll have processors that are being actively researched and updated, unlike the PowerPC processors which IBM seemed content to just let sit in a drawer only to bring it out every so often to add a few hundred MHz to to keep everyone happy.

If you're going to give up on Macintosh just because they're running on a new processor then you're an idiot.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject: not an idiot
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:31 pm 
Offline
Student Driver

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 6:57 pm
Posts: 16
Location: House
i will use new macs - but these mac will not be the same macs that were before...

mac os x is crap


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:38 am 
Offline
Tinkerer

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:26 am
Posts: 41
Location: Orlando, Fl
I don't care if I get in trouble for this, but someone has to say it: You're a complete fuckwit.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 5:51 am 
Offline
Expert User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 8:59 am
Posts: 4809
Location: Sittard, The Netherlands
OK People, let's stick to civilized language here, OK?

Cat_7


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 6:45 am 
Offline
Forum All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 11:50 am
Posts: 1217
Location: Ouraion
8O :lol:

Why is this in the SheepShaver folder anyway? Wait for the drugs to wear off before posting please. :P


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 8:08 pm 
Offline
Tinkerer

Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 2:23 pm
Posts: 55
Location: Canada
Mac Emu wrote:
8O :lol:

Why is this in the SheepShaver folder anyway? Wait for the drugs to wear off before posting please. :P


LOL :lol:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:00 am 
Offline
Mac Mechanic

Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 6:55 pm
Posts: 160
> I love macintoshes that they are - PowerPC and 68k processors NOT x86!!! Fuck Intel, PCs and other SHIT!

wow man, now that shit sounds kinda dumb. if you're such a macmaniac, you surely remember all the issues apple had in order to get provided enough IBM CPU's? and remember how long IBM CPU's stay stucked at 450 MHz? And then, why you care if a mac has a x86 or a PowerPC? the CPU aint shit, the hardware still remains Apple, and the OS too. and no Mac OS 9 will not run on x86 macs, and least not without some emulation because it is not compiled for x86....

> Mac OS X... it is really like Windows

damn man, you like sayin dumb things, dont you?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:32 pm 
Offline
Forum All-Star
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:02 am
Posts: 1053
Location: Israel
CFran2 wrote:
and no Mac OS 9 will not run on x86 macs, and least not without some emulation because it is not compiled for x86....

That's something we didn't think about... What will happen to Classic on the MacIntel? Will it run as somekind of emulation environment? Or will they write some OS9/Intel that could run on the Classic environment of the Mactel?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 3:26 pm 
Offline
Master Emulator

Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 2:14 pm
Posts: 360
Apple have said there will be no support for Classic on the Intel platform. I posted this in another thread. We'll just have to use Sheepshaver :wink:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject: hmm
PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:33 pm 
Offline
Student Driver

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 6:57 pm
Posts: 16
Location: House
but will the emulation of macos classic be faster?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 8:32 pm 
Offline
Real Swell Guy!

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 4:20 am
Posts: 116
SheepShaver performance is expected to be the same accross different OSes on the same system (except for Windows).

Besides, if Apple is willing to disclose some implementation details of the obsolete MacOS Classic NanoKernel, then some stuff can be made faster and more compatible.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 12:59 am 
Offline
Master Emulator

Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 2:14 pm
Posts: 360
gb wrote:
SheepShaver performance is expected to be the same accross different OSes on the same system (except for Windows).

Besides, if Apple is willing to disclose some implementation details of the obsolete MacOS Classic NanoKernel, then some stuff can be made faster and more compatible.


We can live in hope!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject: Re: hmm
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:33 pm 
Offline
Mac Mechanic

Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 6:55 pm
Posts: 160
kaziorvb2 wrote:
but will the emulation of macos classic be faster?


no, why would it? having a x86, it will take it the same task to get to emulate mac os classic, i mean emulating a whole PowerPC machine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:36 pm 
Offline
Tinkerer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 9:00 pm
Posts: 47
Location: la la land
All hardware sucks, all software sucks.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 12:38 am 
Offline
Mac Mechanic

Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 6:55 pm
Posts: 160
DittoBox wrote:
All hardware sucks, all software sucks.


nooooo, not all, only the ones with bugs suck ;)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 6:05 pm 
Offline
Expert User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 4:15 pm
Posts: 872
Location: UK
Quote:
Mac OS X... it is really like Windows

I partially aggree with that.

Quote:
End of: "Think Different"
Begin of: "Think The Same"


True.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote Post a reply  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [ 17 posts ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
 

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group