Darwin/x86

willhart · Post by **willhart** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 3:45 am

I'm just wondering, is there any practical use for installing Darwin/x86? Does it have any sort of GUI I could install on it?

PPC_Digger · Post by **PPC_Digger** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:18 pm

willhart wrote:I'm just wondering, is there any practical use for installing Darwin/x86? Does it have any sort of GUI I could install on it?

If I remember correctly, it comes with a simple X-Server. I guess you could compile KDE/GNOME and use it as a desktop OS. But as I recall, Apple created Darwin/x86 just to show it's possible (and possibly make a secret OSX/x86 version :D ).

Post by **Cat_7** » Fri Jan 21, 2005 11:00 pm

Also, the set of supported hardware is rather limited, so take care on what machine you would try an install on.

Cat_7

willhart · Post by **willhart** » Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:40 am

So no chance of GFX acceleration with my Radeon 9600 XT...

Does Softpear run on it yet?

robojam · Post by **robojam** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 7:03 pm

Just try this link to solve all your problems:

http://www.pharmaceuticalsandahugewinki ... friend.com

Errr...it is OK to post that here isn't it....

Stephen Coates · Post by **Stephen Coates** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 7:53 pm

robojam is.....

a spammer?!

ataxy · Post by **ataxy** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:13 pm

robojam wrote:Just try this link to solve all your problems:

http://www.pharmaceuticalsandahugewinki ... friend.com

Errr...it is OK to post that here isn't it....

humm i tryed it but it does not work

robojam · Post by **robojam** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:26 pm

Stephen Coates wrote:robojam is.....

a spammer?!

DOH! Busted!

Stephen Coates · Post by **Stephen Coates** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 10:50 pm

I think I'll have to ban him.

Actually, I won't be too harsh. But there's something I will do.

*Goes to play with admin control panel*

Stephen Coates · Post by **Stephen Coates** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 10:58 pm

Done. Look to the left of your posts to find out what I have done. It's only a joke, so if you don't like it, tell me and I will change it back to a normal rank.

ataxy · Post by **ataxy** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 4:52 am

Stephen Coates wrote:Done. Look to the left of your posts to find out what I have done. It's only a joke, so if you don't like it, tell me and I will change it back to a normal rank.

lol thats a good one
so he is the winkie man from now on?

robojam · Post by **robojam** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 4:24 pm

ataxy wrote:
Stephen Coates wrote:Done. Look to the left of your posts to find out what I have done. It's only a joke, so if you don't like it, tell me and I will change it back to a normal rank.
lol thats a good one
so he is the winkie man from now on?

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'll behave from now on! I promise!!!!!!!!!!

Stephen Coates · Post by **Stephen Coates** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 6:47 pm

Sure? I'm only a few clicks away from the ban control!

robojam · Post by **robojam** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 7:29 pm

Couldn't you change it to "Has a big winkie"?

Maybe not...just change it back...please....

Stephen Coates · Post by **Stephen Coates** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:01 pm

I understand how embarrasing that can be. I've given you a big winkie rank for now. I'll change it back to normal if you want.

promise.

Post by **Cat_7** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:43 pm

A big winkie can still be small. A big wink, that would certainly do it!

Cat_7

Stephen Coates · Post by **Stephen Coates** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:53 pm

I don't quite get what you mean.

We are talking about the same thing?

robojam · Post by **robojam** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 7:20 pm

I don't care because I've got a big winkie...and it's official!

Stephen Coates · Post by **Stephen Coates** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 10:34 pm

Bet you and your wife have a lot of fun then!

Do you want to keep the rank?

Post by **Cat_7** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 9:03 am

When you talk about something lovingly, you often use words that make the object smaller, like "my little girl" or "lovely doggy" or "nice pussy" even when the object itself is full-grown.

Hence: Wink->Winkie

So when you really mean "big small wink", it could still be small, couldn't it?

Or was this too far fetched?

Cat_7

ataxy · Post by **ataxy** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:38 pm

Cat_7 wrote:When you talk about something lovingly, you often use words that make the object smaller, like "my little girl" or "lovely doggy" or "nice pussy" even when the object itself is full-grown.

Hence: Wink->Winkie

So when you really mean "big small wink", it could still be small, couldn't it?

Or was this too far fetched?

Cat_7

hummm you have a point there ....so what do you have to say about that robojammy

Stephen Coates · Post by **Stephen Coates** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:58 pm

So if robojam says he has a big winkie, it could mean that he has a small winkie, and if he says he has a small winkie it could mean that he has a big winkie?

Now how many times have I used the work winkie in this post?

5. I better shut up going on about winkies. Now I've used the word 6 times

robojam · Post by **robojam** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:06 pm

ataxy wrote:hummm you have a point there ....so what do you have to say about that robojammy

I think he's wrong ataxyaxy...

ataxy · Post by **ataxy** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:13 pm

robojam wrote:
ataxy wrote:hummm you have a point there ....so what do you have to say about that robojammy
I think he's wrong ataxyaxy...

so by calling me aataxyaxy does this mean that i am big as in fat or big as in big muscle or since you didnt place the word big or small before it it means absolutly nothing

Darwin/x86

Darwin/x86

Re: Darwin/x86